Abstract P337: Determinants and Influence of Breast Arterial Calcifications on Risk of Cardiovascular Disease

Background: Breast arterial calcifications (BAC) are incidentally observed on screening mammography. BAC has been shown to be associated with the presence of coronary artery calcification (CAC) and increased risk of coronary artery disease (CAD). Given that population-based mammography is currently recommended to women, the evaluation of BAC may be important in identifying high-risk women without additional cost or radiation exposure. Aims: We sought to identify reproductive and cardiovascular risk factors associated with the presence of detectable BAC and CAC in women participated to mammography screening. Also, we aimed to determine the association between BAC and presence of CAC. Further, we investigated presence of BAC, CAC and estimated 10-year risk of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD). Methods: In this cross-sectional study, reproductive history and CVD risk factors were obtained in 215 women ≥ 18 years of age that underwent mammography and cardiac computed tomographic angiography (CCTA) within 2 years of each other between January 2007 and September 2017 at Weill Cornell Medicine/ New York Presbyterian hospital (WCM/NYP). BAC was recorded in two ways: a binary scale (presence/absence) and a semi-quantitative scale (mild, moderate, severe). CAC was calculated using the Agatston method and was recorded as a binary variable (presence/absence). Information regarding reproductive history and CVD risk factors, medical history, and relevant demographics were obtained by chart review. Odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs), with adjustment for age at study entry as a potential confounder, were estimated. The 10-year risk of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) was calculated using the Pooled Cohort Risk Equations. Results: The odds of presence of BAC increased with increasing age . Women age ≥60 had a near 6-fold higher odds of BAC (OR = 5.77; 95% CI = 2.45 to 16.00) compared with women <60 years old. Other factors associated with presence of BAC after controlling for age were diastolic blood pressure ≥80 ( P = 0.0008), systolic blood pressure ≥140 ( P = 0.0009), number of children (P = 0.01). Younger age at first birth (≤28 years) was associated with 3-fold higher odds of BAC compared with women with age at first birth >28 years. Except for age at study entry, the only factor associated with presence of CAC was hyperlipidemia ( P = 0.002). We found no association between presence of BAC with CAC. We observed women with presence of both BAC and CAC had the highest estimated 10-year risk of ASCVD: 18.54%, followed by presence of BAC but absence of CAC 11.65%, absence of BAC and presence of CAC 6.01%, and women with no BAC and no CAC presence had a mean 10-year risk of ASCVD of 5.25%. Conclusions: These findings support the value of BAC in identifying women at potentially increased risk of future cardiovascular disease without additional cost and radiation exposure.