Abstract P2-02-07: Patients’ selection of daily timing of oral intake of adjuvant hormonotherapy (HT) and everolimus (EVE) for high risk early breast cancer in the UCBG-UNIRAD phase III trial

Abstract Background: Everolimus (EVE) addition to adjuvant hormonotherapy (HT) for high-risk early breast cancer (BC) did not improve 3-year disease-free survival (DFS) compared with ET alone in the randomized UNIRAD trial (NCT01805271) (1). Most patients (pts) withdrew from EVE for adverse events nearly midway before the expected treatment duration of 2 years. The main EVE target involves m-TOR-induced S6 protein phosphorylation, which is controlled by the molecular circadian clock in mice and cells. Toward the analysis of possible circadian time-dependencies in EVE toxicities and efficacy, we first determine the actual distribution of the daily times chosen by the patients for both oral EVE and HT intakes. Patients and methods: The registered pts were asked to record the clock hours they chose for both HT and EVE or placebo (PLAC) intakes within four possible daily 6-h slots, i.e. from 06:00 to 11:59 (morning), 12:00 to 17:59 (midtime), 18:00 to 23:59 (evening), or 24:00 to 05:59, (night) in a daily diary throughout their participation in the trial. Modifications in times of drugs intake were reported. Comparisons between groups involved Kruskal-Wallis sum test and Pearson’s Chi-squared and Fisher’s exact tests. Results: Out of 1,278 randomized patients, 1063 (83,1 %) recorded the times of EVE or PLAC intakes, 852 recorded those for HT intakes. Only 10 pts reported night EVE/PLAC intakes and were not considered here. Of the 1053 evaluated pts; 549 pts took EVE/PLAC in the morning, 82 pts at midtime and 422 in the evening. As compared with evening intakes, morning or midtime intakes of EVE or PLAC were significantly associated with an older age, and post-menopausal status, whilst younger and premenopausal women preferentially chose evening intakes (p< 0.001 for both). Consistently, HT with aromatase inhibitors (AI) were mostly taken in the morning or at midtime, whereas tamoxifene (TAM) was mostly taken the evening (p = 0.001). Tumor size, lymph nodes involvement, histological grade, hormonal receptors status, and EVE initial dose were similarly distributed among the three time slots (Table 1). A similar distribution of oral intake times as in the whole timing study population was found according to age, menopausal status and HT type in the EVE arm (N=508 pts), and in the HT population (+/- EVE or PLAC) (N=852 pts). Initial oral timing intake was modified for EVE by 50 of 508 pts (10%) and for HT by 10 of 852 pts (1%). Conclusion: To the best of our knowledge, it is the first time that the patients’ spontaneous selection of daily times for oral intakes of a targeted agent (EVE) and HT is reported in a large series of early breast cancer pts. Age and menopausal status were important determinants of patient-selected daily timing intakes of both EVE and HT, as well as HT types. These findings will be carefully considered in the analyses of possible EVE and HT timing effects on adverse events and efficacy of the current adjuvant regimens. 1) Bachelot T et al, J Clin Oncol. 2022 May 23 Citation Format: Sylvie Giacchetti, Anne-Sophie Hamy, Thomas Bachelot, Jérôme Lemonnier, Fabrice Andre, David A. Cameron, Judith Bliss, Sylvie Chabaud, Anne-Claire Hardy-Bessard, Magali Lacroix-Triki, Jean-Luc Canon, Hervé R. Bonnefoi, Mario Campone, Paul Cottu, Florence Dalenc, Annabelle Ballesta, Francis Lévi, Enora Laas. Patients’ selection of daily timing of oral intake of adjuvant hormonotherapy (HT) and everolimus (EVE) for high risk early breast cancer in the UCBG-UNIRAD phase III trial. [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2022 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2022 Dec 6-10; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2023;83(5 Suppl):Abstract nr P2-02-07.