A new filtering approach for multiple Doppler Lidar setups

<p>We compare the wind measurements of a virtual tower triple Doppler Lidar setup to those of a sonic anemometer located at a height of 90&#160;m above ground on an instrumented tower and with those of a single Doppler Lidar. The instruments were set up at the boundary-layer field site of the German Meteorological Service (DWD) in July and August of 2020 during the FESST@MOL (Field Experiment on sub-mesoscale spatio-temporal variability at the Meteorological Observatory Lindenberg) 2020 campaign. &#160;The triple Lidar setup was operated in a stare and in a step/stare mode at six heights between 90 and 500&#160;m above ground, while the single Lidar was operated in a continuous scan Velocity-Azimuth-Display (VAD) mode with an azimuthal resolution of around 1.5&#160;&#176; and a zenith angle of 55.5&#160;&#176;. Overall, both Lidar methods showed a good agreement for the whole study period for different averaging times and scan modes compared to the sonic anemometer. Additionally, we developed and show a new filtering approach based on a Median Absolute Deviation (MAD) filter for the virtual tower setup and compare it to a filtering approach based on a signal-to-noise ratio SNR threshold. The advantage of the MAD filter is that it is not based on a strict threshold but on the MAD of each 30-second period and can, therefore, better adapt to changing atmospheric conditions. In the comparison the MAD filter leads to a greater data availability while upholding similar comparability and bias values between the triple Lidar and sonic anemometer setups. Our results also show that a single Doppler Lidar is a viable method for measuring wind speed and direction with only small disadvantages, at least for measurement heights similar to our investigation and for comparable heterogeneous but flat landscapes.</p>