Failure Mode and Effects Analysis for a Photovoltaic Inverter

Buck Brown,Zheyu Zhang,Johan Enslin, Shuagshuang Jin,Ramtin Hadidi,Jin Tan,Peter Hacke, Ram Thiagarajan,Shuan Dong,Xiaonan Lu, Miles Russell,Matt Ursino, Joe Hodges, Ford Brendan, Daniel Clemens

PV Reliability Workshop (PVRW), virtual, February 21-25, 2022(2022)

引用 0|浏览5
暂无评分
摘要
While PV panel reliability continues to increase, PV inverters become the limiting factor for PV system reliability. Consequently, it is critical to have a generic tool from a third party for PV inverter reliability assessment to help 1) utilities/PV farm operators schedule maintenance in advance, and 2) inverter developers improve the next-generation design. However, these two things cannot be accomplished without first understanding the reasons behind inverter failure. Following this idea, as the first step, it is essential to identify and investigate the most failure-prone components within a PV inverter system. After all, any system is only as reliable as the components that are contained within it. This motivates the failure mode and effects analysis (FMEA) work presented for this workshop. The FMEA is conducted as follows: first, the overview of the methodology on the development of the FMEA is presented; then, based on a top-down approach starting from the PV inverter system, critical inverter components with high failure rates are identified and summarized; afterward, a thorough FMEA study at a component-level is performed and its results, including failure modes, failure mechanisms, and critical stressors, are tabulated; finally, according to three rankings (chance of occurrence, severity of occurrence, and ease of detection prior to failure) for each failure mechanism provided by the FMEA, risk priority numbers are calculated and the failure mechanisms along with the critical stressors are ranked in terms of their potentially detrimental effect on the PV inverter.
更多
查看译文
关键词
failure
AI 理解论文
溯源树
样例
生成溯源树,研究论文发展脉络
Chat Paper
正在生成论文摘要