Distinct responses to αPD-1, αPD-L1 and αPD-L2 immunotherapy in aged versus young hosts includes T-cell stem cell effects and PD-L2 expression differences

Abstract Aging is the biggest risk factor for cancer, yet little is known about how it affects cancer immunotherapy. Melanoma response to αPD-1/αPD-L1 correlates with CD8+ TCF-1+ T cell stem cell (TCSC) generation. We tested αPD-1 (100 μg/mouse), αPD-L1 (100 μg/mouse) or αPD-L2 (200 μg/mouse) in aged (18–24 months) and young (3–8 months) mice challenged orthotopically with B16 melanoma (SQ) or ID8agg ovarian cancer (IP). Tumors and draining lymph nodes (TDLN) were analyzed by flow. We previously reported that αPD-1 treats young and aged with B16 and αPD-L1 only treats young. αPD-L2 treated B16 in aged but not young, the first single agent cancer immunotherapy exhibiting this property. Preliminary data indicate survival benefit of αPD-L2 against ID8agg in aged but not young mice. Aged mice tolerated all treatments comparable to young. B16 efficacy in young (αPD-1, αPD-L1) and aged (αPD-1, αPD-L2) correlated with increased TCSC and total TIL, but TCSC differed by age and treatment. PD-1 interacts with PD-L1 and PD-L2 while PD-L1 interacts with PD-1 and CD80. Aged mice expressed significantly more T-cell PD-1 and PD-L2 and up to 40-fold more PD-L2, PD-L1 and CD80 vs. young on myeloid cells and NK cells. We generated bone marrow-derived DC with GM-CSF. Aged DC expressed much high PD-L2 versus young, suggesting a cell-intrinsic PD-L2 age bias. Treatment differences in aged versus young could depend on these immune checkpoint or TCSC differences. We are now identifying mechanisms for increased PD-L2 and contributions to αPD-L2 efficacy in aged, and testing TCSC effects on treatments. Our work can improve cancer immunotherapy in aged hosts and provide models for treatment resistance in young hosts.