Cross-national psychometric evaluation of the Jefferson Scale of Empathy version for medical students

Giovanni Piumatti, Manuel João Tavares Mendes da Costa,Stefano Ardenghi,Anne Baroffio, Marta Elorduy,Margaret W. Gerbase, Marie-Paule Gustin, Jordi Palés,Thelma Quince,Giulia Rampoldi,Maria Grazia Strepparava,Pia Thiemann, Montserrat Virumbrales,Patrício Costa

crossref(2022)

引用 0|浏览2
暂无评分
摘要
Objective. To examine the factorial structure of the Jefferson Scale of Empathy–Medical student version (JSE-S) and assess items’ discriminatory ability at higher and lower empathy levels in medical student populations from different countries and languages.Methods. JSE-S datasets were retrieved from previous studies of 4,113 first- and/or second-year medical students from Switzerland, Portugal, Italy, Brazil, France, Spain, New Zealand, UK, Ireland, Mexico, and Peru. Parallel principal component analyses and item response theory were applied.Results. Excluding item 18, the Compassionate Care subscale emerged in five samples (Switzerland, Portugal, Italy, France and UK/Ireland), Perspective Taking in three (Switzerland, Portugal and UK/Ireland) and Walking in Patient’s Shoes in five (Switzerland, Portugal, Spain, UK/Ireland and Mexico/Peru). All subscales had items providing overlapping information. The JSE-S subscales had reliable high test performance at low empathy levels, while when the JSE-S increased, the standard error also increased.Conclusion. There was no consistent support across countries for the JSE-S three-factorial structure. Items provided redundant information and discriminatory power decreased when aiming to differentiate students at high empathy levels.Practice Implications. A JSE-S revision to improve cross-cultural comparability, results’ generalisability and validity should focus on suppressing or reformulating items that cannot differentiate medical students’ empathy.
更多
查看译文
AI 理解论文
溯源树
样例
生成溯源树,研究论文发展脉络
Chat Paper
正在生成论文摘要