A Dutch randomized controlled study shows autologous fat transfer with pre-expansion is more cost-effective in the long term than implants.

J L M Wederfoort, N Voeten, N N P M Smeins, J E Hommes, B A B Essers,R R W J van der Hulst,A Piatkowski

Journal of plastic, reconstructive & aesthetic surgery : JPRAS（2023）

引用 0|浏览1

暂无评分

摘要

Mean EQ-5D-5L QALY and costs were higher for AFT over the first year after reconstruction. However, these costs were low; therefore, AFT was estimated to be more cost-effective over the 10- and 30-year period since no additional surgeries are necessary for this group. Larger cohorts are required to confirm AFT is more cost-effective in the long term.

查看译文

关键词

Autologous fat grafting, Economic evaluation, Breast reconstruction, Implant-based reconstruction, Cost-effectiveness, Breast cancer

AI 理解论文

溯源树

样例

生成溯源树，研究论文发展脉络

Chat Paper

正在生成论文摘要