Perception of eHealth Programs for Cardiovascular Health: Qualitative Systematic Review and Meta-synthesis.

BACKGROUND:Despite emerging evidence on the effectiveness of eHealth interventions in improving cardiovascular health, little is known about the perception of use and efficacy of these interventions and real-world application. OBJECTIVE:We sought to develop an in-depth understanding of the perceptions of eHealth interventions in improving cardiovascular health. METHODS:This is a systematic review and meta-synthesis of qualitative studies. A comprehensive search of multiple databases and a manual search of the references list were conducted. Meta-synthesis of qualitative data was performed to review and interpret the findings. The study report followed the ENTREQ checklist. RESULTS:Four themes emerged regarding perceptions of eHealth interventions: preferred eHealth intervention design features, enabling healthcare professionals' support, eHealth engagement for health benefits, and barriers to eHealth engagement. Intervention design features should integrate motivational elements, use an eHealth literacy lens, and enhance cultural relevance. Healthcare professionals appreciated these new working methods but voiced concern about competency building. Real-world usage initiation was driven by perceived needs and usefulness, whereas persistent engagement was inspired by intrinsic motivation in participants. CONCLUSIONS:eHealth interventions were appreciated as a valuable opportunity for providing alternative/supplementary cardiac care for health optimization. Participants commented on the need for more explicit and accurate health information presentation, and they appreciated the motivational elements in empowering them with self-determination over daily self-care behaviors. Professionals raised the need for specific guidance to enhance competency and intervention fidelity when delivering eHealth care.