Perceptions, attitudes and beliefs towards soya among healthy Asian women participating in a soya randomised controlled trial

The soya-breast cancer risk relationship remains controversial in Asia due to limited and inconsistent research findings and is exacerbated by difficulties in recruiting and retaining participants in intervention trials. Understanding public perceptions towards soya is important for designing effective intervention trials. Here, we administered a close-ended, quantitative survey to healthy, peri- and post-menopausal Asian women in the Malaysian Soy and Mammographic Density (MiSo) Study to assess perception towards soya and explore motivators and barriers that affect study adherence using the Capability, Opportunity, Motivation and Belief (COM-B) Model and Theoretical Domains Framework (TDF). Of 118 participants, the majority reported the belief that soya promotes good health (Supplement = 85.7 %, Diet = 90.0 %, Control = 87.9 %). Most participants reported obtaining information about soya from the internet (Supplement = 61.0 %, Diet = 55.3 %, Control = 35.9 %), while health professionals were least reported (Supplement = 9.8 %, Diet = 7.9 %, Control = 5.1 %). Stratified analyses by study completion and adherence status yielded comparable findings. By the end of the study, dietary arm participants reported a strong belief that soya has no impact on their health (Supplement = 7.1 % v. Diet = 20.0 % v. Control = 0.0 %, P = 0.012). Motivation and opportunity strongly facilitated soya consumption, while psychological capability was the most common barrier to consumption though less evident among dietary arm participants. While most Asian women have a positive perception towards soya, theory-based intervention trials are warranted to understand the perception-study adherence relationship and to accurately inform the public of the health effects of soya.