Aggregated data from the same laboratories participating in two glucose external quality assessment schemes show that commutability and transfers of values to control materials are decisive for the biases found

ObjectivesWe report the results of glucose measurements performed during one year by the same measurement procedures (MPs) in 58 Norwegian hospital laboratories using control materials provided by external quality assessment (EQA) schemes from two different providers. The providers used materials with presumed vs. verified commutability and transfers of values using reference material vs. using a highest-order reference MP.MethodsData from six Labquality and three Noklus glucose EQA surveys were aggregated for each MP (Abbott Alinity, Abbott Architect, Roche Cobas, and Siemens Advia) in each scheme. For each EQA result, percent difference from target value (% bias) was calculated. Median percent bias for each MP per scheme was then calculated.ResultsThe median % biases observed for each MP in the Labquality scheme were significantly larger than those in the Noklus scheme, which uses verified commutable control materials and highest-order reference MP target values. The difference ranged from 1.2 (Roche Cobas, 2.9 vs. 1.7 %) to 4.4 percentage points (Siemens Advia, 3.2 % vs. -1.2 %). The order of bias size for the various MPs was different in the two schemes. In contrast to the Labquality scheme, the median % biases observed in the Noklus scheme for Abbott Alinity (-0.1 %), Abbott Architect (-0.5 %), and Siemens Advia (-1.2 %) were not significantly different from target value (p>0.756).ConclusionsThis study underlines the importance of using verified commutable EQA materials and target values traceable to reference MPs in EQA schemes designed for assessment of metrological traceability of laboratory results.