Intersite brain MRI volumetric biases persist even in a harmonized multisubject study of multiple sclerosis.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE:Multicenter study designs involving a variety of MRI scanners have become increasingly common. However, these present the issue of biases in image-based measures due to scanner or site differences. To assess these biases, we imaged 11 volunteers with multiple sclerosis (MS) with scan and rescan data at four sites. METHODS:Images were acquired on Siemens or Philips scanners at 3 Tesla. Automated white matter lesion detection and whole-brain, gray and white matter, and thalamic volumetry were performed, as well as expert manual delineations of T1 magnetization-prepared rapid acquisition gradient echo and T2 fluid-attenuated inversion recovery lesions. Random-effect and permutation-based nonparametric modeling was performed to assess differences in estimated volumes within and across sites. RESULTS:Random-effect modeling demonstrated model assumption violations for most comparisons of interest. Nonparametric modeling indicated that site explained >50% of the variation for most estimated volumes. This expanded to >75% when data from both Siemens and Philips scanners were included. Permutation tests revealed significant differences between average inter- and intrasite differences in most estimated brain volumes (P < .05). The automatic activation of spine coil elements during some acquisitions resulted in a shading artifact in these images. Permutation tests revealed significant differences between thalamic volume measurements from acquisitions with and without this artifact. CONCLUSION:Differences in brain volumetry persisted across MR scanners despite protocol harmonization. These differences were not well explained by variance component modeling; however, statistical innovations for mitigating intersite differences show promise in reducing biases in multicenter studies of MS.