Chrome Extension
WeChat Mini Program
Use on ChatGLM

Inverse Probability of Treatment Analysis of Open Vs Endovascular Repair in Ruptured Infrarenal Aortic Aneurysm – Cohort Study

International Journal of Surgery(2020)SCI 3区

Med Univ Vienna | Dept Biomed Imaging & Image Guided Therapy

Cited 0|Views24
Abstract
Background: To compare open repair (OR) with EVAR for the management of ruptured infrarenal abdominal aortic aneurysms (RAAA) in a cohort study over a time period of 15 years with inverse probability of treatment weights. Material and methods: From 2000/01 through 2015/12 136 patients were treated for RAAA, 98 (72.1%) underwent OR, 38 (27.9%) were treated with EVAR. Thirty-day and long-term mortality (survival) were analyzed in this IRB-approved retrospective cohort study. Treatment modalities were compared using inverse probability of treatment weights to adjust for imbalances in demographic data and risk factors. Results: EVAR patients were older (75.11 +/- 7.17 vs 69.79 +/- 10.24; p=0.001). There was no statistical difference in gender, hypertension, COPD, CAD, or diabetes. GFR was significantly higher in OR patients (71.4 +/- 31.09 vs. 53.68 +/- 25.73). Postoperative dialysis was required more frequently in EVAR patients: 11% vs. 2% (p = 0.099). In the OR group, adjusted cumulative survival was 70.4% (61.1, 81.1) at 30 days, 47.0% (37.1, 59.6) at one year and 38.3% (28.6, 51.3) at 5 years. In the EVAR group the corresponding numbers were 77.0% (67.7, 87.5), 67.5% (57.0, 80.0) and 41.7% (30.4, 57.4), respectively. Conclusion: There is evidence for EVAR patients exhibiting a benefit in one-year survival, while patients treated with OR may have more favorable long-term survival given they survive for at least one year. Herein we provide a statistically rigorous comparison of OR and EVAR in short and long-term outcomes with up to 15 years of follow-up.
More
Translated text
Key words
Aortic aneurysm,Infrarenal,Ruptured,Open repair,EVAR,Propensity score
PDF
Bibtex
AI Read Science
AI Summary
AI Summary is the key point extracted automatically understanding the full text of the paper, including the background, methods, results, conclusions, icons and other key content, so that you can get the outline of the paper at a glance.
Example
Background
Key content
Introduction
Methods
Results
Related work
Fund
Key content
  • Pretraining has recently greatly promoted the development of natural language processing (NLP)
  • We show that M6 outperforms the baselines in multimodal downstream tasks, and the large M6 with 10 parameters can reach a better performance
  • We propose a method called M6 that is able to process information of multiple modalities and perform both single-modal and cross-modal understanding and generation
  • The model is scaled to large model with 10 billion parameters with sophisticated deployment, and the 10 -parameter M6-large is the largest pretrained model in Chinese
  • Experimental results show that our proposed M6 outperforms the baseline in a number of downstream tasks concerning both single modality and multiple modalities We will continue the pretraining of extremely large models by increasing data to explore the limit of its performance
Try using models to generate summary,it takes about 60s
Must-Reading Tree
Example
Generate MRT to find the research sequence of this paper
Related Papers
Data Disclaimer
The page data are from open Internet sources, cooperative publishers and automatic analysis results through AI technology. We do not make any commitments and guarantees for the validity, accuracy, correctness, reliability, completeness and timeliness of the page data. If you have any questions, please contact us by email: report@aminer.cn
Chat Paper

要点】:本研究通过15年的队列研究,使用逆概率处理权重比较了开放修复(OR)与腔内修复(EVAR)治疗破裂腹主动脉瘤(RAAA)的短期和长期生存率,发现EVAR在一年生存率上有优势,而OR患者在至少存活一年后可能有更佳的长期生存率。

方法】:采用逆概率处理权重调整人口数据和风险因素的不平衡,对两种治疗方式的短期和长期生存率进行了比较。

实验】:在2000/01至2015/12期间共136名RAAA患者参与研究,其中98名(72.1%)接受OR治疗,38名(27.9%)接受EVAR治疗。通过逆概率处理权重分析得出,两组患者在30天、一年和五年生存率的差异。数据来源于经伦理委员会批准的回顾性队列研究。