Experimental study on tesla valve and bypass manifold to suppress feedback of rotating detonation engine fuel by kerosene

In this paper, the effects of the Tesla valve intake structure with or without bypass manifold on suppressing pressure feedback and combustion product backflow in rotating detonation engine fueled by kerosene and enriched air with 29% oxygen content are investigated, with the configuration of convergent–divergent intake without bypass manifold being used for comparison. The working range, detonation wave propagation characteristics, and propulsion performance for the three configurations are evaluated. It is found that the Tesla valve intake structure can effectively improve the suppression of pressure feedback and combustion product backflow through the diversion function of the Tesla valve bypass channel and that the addition of the bypass manifold further improves the suppression of pressure feedback. The Tesla valve intake with bypass manifold configuration has the best ability to suppress pressure feedback, with a minimum value of pressure feedback percentage of about 6.5% and a minimum value of air plenum pressure fluctuation percentage of about 6.7%. By comparison, the minimum value of pressure feedback percentage of the convergent–divergent intake without bypass manifold configuration is about 29.8%, and its minimum value of pressure feedback percentage is about 7.8%. The Tesla valve intake without bypass manifold configuration is most effective in suppressing combustion product backflow, with the effective inlet area ratio of about 95.7%. Under the same conditions, the minimum effective inlet area ratio of the convergent–divergent intake without bypass manifold configuration is about 90.2%. Ultimately, optimizing the engine structure leads to a broader working range and higher propulsion performance. The Tesla valve intake structure broadens the working range by suppressing the generation of the longitudinal pulsed detonation mode. When the bypass manifold is incorporated, some combustible reactants directly enter the rear of the combustion chamber from the head of the chamber, and the working range is reduced. Compared with the convergent–divergent intake without bypass manifold configuration, the working range of the Tesla valve intake with bypass manifold configuration is widened by 383.3%, and that of the without bypass manifold configuration by 700%. Both the Tesla valve intake and bypass manifold increase the strength of detonation waves and improve propulsion performance. The Tesla valve intake with bypass manifold configuration has the highest specific thrust, at about 90.1 N s3/(kg·m). This is increased by an average of 10% compared with the Tesla valve intake without bypass manifold configuration, and by an average of 30.1% compared with the convergent–divergent intake configuration.