L'& eacute;valuation de la validit & eacute; de la performance en neuropsychologie clinique : sondage sur les pratiques et les croyances des neuropsychologues qu & eacute;b & eacute;cois

The present study aims to describe the current beliefs and practices of Quebec neuropsychologists as they relate to performance and symptom assessment validity. The study also examines Quebec neuropsychologists' beliefs, methods of detection and adherence to practice recommendations in comparison to their American counterparts. In order to effectively identify the factors that contribute to Quebec neuropsychologists' close adherence to practice recommendations, the characteristics of clinicians and their practices were also explored. A survey on assessment validity practices and beliefs was completed by a sample of 113 Quebec neuropsychologists and showed that they hold erroneous beliefs and make little use of subjective or objective methods of detection in their clinical practice. Those who do use methods of detection mainly favour subjective over objective methods. Neuropsychologists whose beliefs are based on scientific facts, with medical and forensic expertise, working with adult and senior populations, and who have continued to acquire knowledge through pertinent post-university training and lectures demonstrated best practices. We found that Quebec neuropsychologists lack knowledge on the issue of validity and that this is detrimental to the development of their practice. Consequently, specific strategies should be put into place to improve the dissemination of knowledge, in particular through written documentation (e.g., practical consensus guidelines, position statements), improved university-level training, and access to continuing education that target the specific needs of neuropsychologists in Quebec.