Efficacy and Safety of a Biosimilar Liraglutide (Melitide?) Versus the Reference Liraglutide (Victoza?) in People with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: A Randomized, Double-Blind, Noninferiority Clinical Trial

Alireza Esteghamati, Mehran Zamanzadeh,Mojtaba Malek, Mohammad Khaledi, Arezoo Monavari,Laily Najafi,Zahra Banazadeh,Ramin Malboosbaf,Rokhsareh Aghili, Sedigheh Mahdikhah, Hasan Ganjizadeh-Zavereh,Hamidreza Kafi,Farhad Hosseinpanah,Mohammad Ebrahim Khamseh

Diabetes therapy : research, treatment and education of diabetes and related disorders(2023)

引用 0|浏览6
暂无评分
摘要
Introduction: Liraglutide effectively controls blood glucose level and reduces body weight. The aim of this study was to compare the efficacy and safety of a biosimilar liraglutide (Melitide (R); CinnaGen, Tehran, Iran) to the reference liraglutide (Victoza (R); Novo Nordisk, Bagsvaerd, Denmark) in people with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM).Methods: In this phase 3 clinical noninferiority trial, adult patients with inadequately controlled T2DM and with hemoglobin A(1C) (HbA(1C)) levels of 7-10.5% on at least two oral glucose-lowering drugs with stable doses for at least 3 months were randomized to receive Melitide (R) (n = 150) or Victoza (R) (n = 150) 1.8 mg/day for 26 weeks. The primary outcome was assessment of the noninferiority of Melitide (R) to Victoza (R) in terms of change in HbA1C level with a prespecified margin of 0.4%. The secondary outcomes were the assessment of additional efficacy parameters (including the proportion of patients achieving HbA1C levels of < 7%), the incidence of adverse events, and immunogenicity.Results: Of the 300 participants enrolled in this study, 235 were included in the per-protocol analysis (112 in the Melitide<(R)> group and 123 in the Victoza (R) group). The mean (standard deviation) changes in HbA(1)C were - 1.76% (1.22) in the Melitide (R) group and - 1.59% (1.31) in the Victoza (R) group. The upper limit of the 95% one-sided confidence interval (CI) of the mean difference between Melitide (R) and Victoza (R) in lowering HbA(1C) was lower than the predefined margin (mean difference - 0.18, 95% CI - 0.5 to 0.15). Similar findings were obtained with the intention-to-treat analysis. No statistically significant differences were observed between the two study arms regarding the proportion of patients achieving HbA(1C) < 7% (p = 0.210), other efficacy parameters (p > 0.05), and reported adverse events (p = 0.916). Furthermore, none of the patients developed anti-liraglutide antibodies.Conclusion: The biosimilar liraglutide (Melitide (R)) was noninferior in efficacy and comparable in safety when compared with the reference liraglutide.
更多
查看译文
关键词
Liraglutide, Melitide(& REG,), Victoza(& REG,), Biosimilar, Diabetes
AI 理解论文
溯源树
样例
生成溯源树,研究论文发展脉络
Chat Paper
正在生成论文摘要