Cost-effectiveness of High-Intensity Interval Training (HIIT) vs Moderate Intensity Steady-State (MISS) Training in UK Cardiac Rehabilitation

Mohammed Albustami,Ned Hartfiel,Joanna M. Charles, Richard Powell, Brian Begg,Stefan T. Birkett, Simon Nichols, Stuart Ennis,Siew Wan Hee, Prithwish Banerjee,Lee Ingle,Rob Shave,Gordon McGregor,Rhiannon T. Edwards

Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation(2023)

引用 0|浏览2
暂无评分
摘要
•In a recent randomized controlled trial, high-intensity interval exercise training (HIIT) was more effective than moderate intensity steady-state (MISS) exercise training for improving cardiorespiratory fitness in people with coronary artery disease attending cardiac rehabilitation. HIIT was also safe and well tolerated. We conducted a secondary health economic analysis to find out if HIIT or MISS exercise training was more cost-effective.•HIIT participants reported slightly higher health service use costs than MISS participants at 12 months.•HIIT participants reported greater gains in quality of life at 12 months.•HIIT was cost effective compared with MISS.
更多
查看译文
关键词
Coronary artery disease,Exercise training,Health economics,Health utility,National Health Service,Rehabilitation
AI 理解论文
溯源树
样例
生成溯源树,研究论文发展脉络
Chat Paper
正在生成论文摘要