谷歌浏览器插件
订阅小程序
在清言上使用

1391P Capmatinib Vs Docetaxel As Second- or Third-Line (2/3L) Therapy in Patients (pts) with METex14-mutated Advanced NSCLC (ansclc): the GeoMETry-III Trial

O.J. Juan Vidal, M.K. Singhal,R.M. Alvarez, F.L. Cecere,P-J. Souquet,S-W. Kim,A. Robeva, A. Jary,S. Glaser, M. Miskic, J. Wolf

Annals of oncology(2023)

引用 0|浏览9
暂无评分
摘要
Capmatinib (cap), a selective MET inhibitor, is approved by multiple health authorities worldwide, including US, Japan, and EU, in METex14-mutated aNSCLC population, based on the phase 2 GeoMETry mono-1 study (NCT02414139). Here, we report the available efficacy and safety of cap vs docetaxel (doc) from GeoMETry-III trial. GeoMETry-III is a multicenter, open-label, randomized, phase 3 trial (NCT04427072). Eligible pts included EGFR wild type, ALK rearrangement−negative, stage IIIB/IIIC or IV METex14–mutated NSCLC who have progressed on 1/2L of systemic therapy. Primary and key secondary endpoints were progression-free survival (PFS) and overall response rate (ORR) by blinded independent review committee (BIRC) assessment per RECIST v1.1, respectively. Although 90 pts were planned to be included in this study, due to slow enrollment, the study was terminated early with 22 patients enrolled. As of Feb 15, 2023, data cutoff, 22 pts were randomized 2:1 to cap (n = 15) or doc (n = 7) arms. Baseline characteristics were generally comparable between arms. The observed benefit with cap vs doc in median PFS was not statistically significant: 6.1 months vs 4.1 months; HR, 0.46; 95% CI 0.16-1.3; P = 0.066. Of 15 pts in cap arm, 8 had partial response (53.3%, 95% CI 26.6-78.7) vs none in doc arm (95% CI 0-41.0). Disease control rate was 73.3%; 95% CI 44.9-92.2 vs 57.1%; 95% CI 18.4-90.1, respectively. Median duration of response in cap was 9.9 months; 95% CI 2.9-NE. Five of 6 doc-treated pts crossed over to cap (at 1.4, 1.9, 6.0, 6.3, and 13.7 months from doc start due to progression), which confounded the overall survival results. No new safety signals were observed for cap. Most frequent treatment-related AEs (≥25%, any grade) in cap were peripheral edema (46.7%) and nausea (33.3%); and in doc were, alopecia (66.7%), anemia (50.0%), asthenia, conjunctivitis, lacrimation increased, onycholysis (33.3% each). Overall, the numerical differences in PFS and ORR showed trends favoring cap, and together with safety, are consistent with previous results of the pivotal GeoMETry mono-1 study. The GeoMETry-III trial was terminated early due to enrollment constraints.
更多
查看译文
AI 理解论文
溯源树
样例
生成溯源树,研究论文发展脉络
Chat Paper
正在生成论文摘要