Dissociable causal roles of dorsolateral prefrontal cortex and primary motor cortex as a function of motor skill expertise

Established models of motor skill learning posit that early stages of learning are dominated by an attentionally demanding, effortful mode of control supported by associative corticostriatal circuits involving the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC). As expertise develops, automatic and “effortless” performance coincides with a transition to a reliance on sensorimotor circuits that include primary motor cortex (M1). However, the dynamics of how control evolves during the transition from novice to expert are currently unclear. This lack of clarity is due, in part, to the fact that most motor learning studies comprise a limited number of training sessions and rely on correlative techniques such as neuroimaging. Here, we train human participants on a discrete motor sequencing task over the course of six weeks, followed by an assessment of the causal roles of DLPFC and M1 at varying levels of expertise. We use repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation to transiently disrupt activity in these regions immediately prior to performance in separate sessions. Our results confirm the dissociable importance of DLPFC and M1 as expertise develops. DLPFC stimulation leads to larger behavioral deficits for novice skills than expert skills, while M1 stimulation leads to relatively larger deficits as expertise develops. However, our results also reveal that prefrontal disruption causes performance deficits at all levels of expertise. These findings challenge existing models and indicate an evolving rather than a strictly diminishing role for DLPFC throughout learning. Significance Statement Motor skills involve the sequential chaining of individual actions. For example, playing the piano involves learning to rapidly transition to from one finger press to another. Human neuroimaging studies have shown that primary motor cortex (M1) and dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC) support novice motor sequencing skills, but activity in both regions declines over training. This has been interpreted as increased efficiency in M1 and yet a reduction in the involvement of DLPFC as expertise develops. We causally test this assumption by using non-invasive brain stimulation to transiently disrupt cortical activity following extended skill training. Although we confirm dissociable contributions of DLPFC and M1 as expertise develops, we show that both regions are necessary for performance regardless of skill level. ### Competing Interest Statement The authors have declared no competing interest.