Device-assisted enteroscopy performance measures in the United Kingdom: DEEP-UK quality improvement project

Mohamed G. Shiha,Reena Sidhu,Laura A. Lucaciu, Christopher Palmer-Jones, Benjamin Ayeboa-Sallah,Nikolaos Lazaridis, Robert Eckersley,George E. Hiner, Dominic Maxfield, Walaa Shaheen, Duaa Abduljabbar, Muhammad A. Hussain, Rosie O'Hare,Perminder S. Phull, John Eccles,Grant R. Caddy, Mohammed A. Butt, Arun Kurup,Amit Chattree,Jonathan Hoare, Jason Jennings,Gaius Longcroft-Wheaton, Paul Collins,Adam Humphries,Alberto Murino,Edward J. Despott,David S. Sanders

ENDOSCOPY(2024)

引用 0|浏览12
暂无评分
摘要
Background Device-assisted enteroscopy (DAE) has become a well-established diagnostic and therapeutic tool for the management of small-bowel pathology. We aimed to evaluate the performance measures for DAE across the UK against the quality benchmarks proposed by the European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE).Methods We retrospectively collected data on patient demographics and DAE performance measures from electronic endoscopy records of consecutive patients who underwent DAE for diagnostic and therapeutic purposes across 12 enteroscopy centers in the UK between January 2017 and December 2022.Results A total of 2005 DAE procedures were performed in 1663 patients (median age 60 years; 53% men). Almost all procedures (98.1%) were performed for appropriate indications. Double-balloon enteroscopy was used for most procedures (82.0%), followed by single-balloon enteroscopy (17.2%) and spiral enteroscopy (0.7%). The estimated depth of insertion was documented in 73.4% of procedures. The overall diagnostic yield was 70.0%. Therapeutic interventions were performed in 42.6% of procedures, with a success rate of 96.6%. Overall, 78.0% of detected lesions were marked with a tattoo. Patient comfort was significantly better with the use of deep sedation compared with conscious sedation (99.7% vs. 68.5%; P < 0.001). Major adverse events occurred in only 0.6% of procedures.Conclusions Performance measures for DAE in the UK meet the ESGE quality benchmarks, with high diagnostic and therapeutic yields, and a low incidence of major adverse events. However, there is room for improvement in optimizing sedation practices, standardizing the depth of insertion documentation, and adopting marking techniques to aid in the follow-up of detected lesions.
更多
查看译文
关键词
enteroscopy performance measures,united kingdom,device-assisted
AI 理解论文
溯源树
样例
生成溯源树,研究论文发展脉络
Chat Paper
正在生成论文摘要