Establishing national clinical diagnostic reference levels and achievable doses for CT examinations in Brazil: A prospective study

Monica Oliveira Bernardo,Lina Karout,Flavio Morgado,Shadi Ebrahimian, Alair Sarmet Santos, Clarissa Amorim, Hilton Muniz Filho, Antonio Moscatelli,Valdair Francisco Muglia, Henrique Schroeder, Danilo Moulin Sales, Renan Gandolpho Henschel, Bruno Giovanni Valese, Felipe Kiiper, Publio Cesar Cavalcanti, Ronaldo Lucena, Tiago Jornada, Valnir de Paula, Marcel Zago,Ricardo Varella, Mauricio Anes, Antonio Marcio Alves Pinheiro,Luiz Claudio de Moura Carvalho,Juliana Santana de Melo Tapajos,Fernando Antonio de Almeida,Kimberly Applegate,Graciano Paulo,Paulo Roberto Costa

EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY(2023)

引用 0|浏览3
暂无评分
摘要
Purpose: Diagnostic reference levels (DRL) and achievable doses (AD) are important tools for radiation dose optimization. Therefore, a prospective study was performed which aimed to establish a multi-parametric, clinical indication based - DRL(DRLCI) and clinical indication - AD (ADCI) for adult CT in Brazil. Methods: The prospective study included 4787 patients (50 +/- 18 years old; male:female 2041:2746) at 13 Brazilian sites that have been submitted to head, paranasal sinus, cervical spine, chest, or abdomen-pelvis CT between January and October 2021 for 13 clinical indications. The sites provided the following information: patient age, gender, weight, height, body mass index[BMI], clinical indications, scanner information(vendor, model, detector configuration), scan parameters (number of scan phases, kV, mA, pitch) and dose-related quantities (CT dose index volume-CTDIvol, dose length product-DLP). Median(AD) and 75th(DRL) percentile CTDIvol and DLP values were estimated for each body region and clinical indications. Non-normal data were analyzed with the Kruskal-Wallis test. Results: In majority of Brazilian sites, body region and clinical indications based DRLs were at or lower than the corresponding DRLs in the US and higher than Europe. Although radiation doses varied significantly for patients in different body mass index groups (p < 0.001), within each body region, there were no differences in radiation doses for different clinical indications (p > 0.1). Radiation doses for 7/13 clinical indications were higher using iterative reconstruction technique than for the filtered back projection. Conclusions: There was substantial variation in Brazil DRLCI across different institutions with higher doses compared to the European standards. There was also a lack of clinical indication-based protocol and dose optimization based on different clinical indications for the same body region.
更多
查看译文
关键词
Diagnostic reference levels,Dose optimization,Patient doses
AI 理解论文
溯源树
样例
生成溯源树,研究论文发展脉络
Chat Paper
正在生成论文摘要