Which Augmentation Should I Use? An Empirical Investigation of Augmentations for Self-Supervised Phonocardiogram Representation Learning

Despite the recent increase in research activity, deep-learning models have not yet been widely accepted in several real-world settings, such as medicine. The shortage of high-quality annotated data often hinders the development of robust and generalizable models, which do not suffer from degraded effectiveness when presented with out-of-distribution (OOD) datasets. Contrastive Self-Supervised Learning (SSL) offers a potential solution to labeled data scarcity, as it takes advantage of unlabeled data to increase model effectiveness and robustness. However, the selection of appropriate transformations during the learning process is not a trivial task and even breaks down the ability of the network to extract meaningful information. In this research, we propose uncovering the optimal augmentations for applying contrastive learning in 1D phonocardiogram (PCG) classification. We perform an extensive comparative evaluation of a wide range of audio-based augmentations, evaluate models on multiple datasets across downstream tasks, and report on the impact of each augmentation. We demonstrate that depending on its training distribution, the effectiveness of a fully-supervised model can degrade up to 32 argue and experimentally demonstrate that, contrastive SSL pretraining can assist in providing robust classifiers which can generalize to unseen, OOD data, without relying on time- and labor-intensive annotation processes by medical experts. Furthermore, the proposed evaluation protocol sheds light on the most promising and appropriate augmentations for robust PCG signal processing, by calculating their effect size on model training. Finally, we provide researchers and practitioners with a roadmap towards producing robust models for PCG classification, in addition to an open-source codebase for developing novel approaches.