Comparison of Patients with Newly Diagnosed (ND) Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML) Treated with Venetoclax and Hypomethylating Agents Vs Other Therapies By TP53 and IDH1/2 Mutation: Results from the AML Real World Evidence (ARC) Initiative

Blood(2022)

引用 0|浏览4
暂无评分
摘要
Introduction: Venetoclax (VEN; a BCL-2 inhibitor) is approved in combination with hypomethylating agents (HMA) or low dose cytarabine for ND adults with AML ineligible for intensive chemotherapy (IC) (i.e., ≥75 years old or comorbidities that preclude use of IC). This study describes the real-world characteristics and clinical outcomes of patients (pts) treated with VEN-HMA vs. non-VEN-based regimens in the ARC Initiative, overall and specifically among pts ≥75 years old or with comorbidities. Methods: A multicenter chart review study including randomly selected adult pts with ND AML treated with VEN (VEN cohort) after April 2016 from 14 academic sites (US: 10; Israel: 4) matched 1:1 to control pts who received non-VEN-based regimens after May 2015 (CON cohort) based on age (<60, 60-74, ≥75) and ELN risk. Interim descriptive results from May 2022 are presented; data collection is ongoing. Clinical outcomes, including composite complete remission (CRc; i.e., CR, CRh, or CRi), minimal residual disease (MRD; assessed by flow cytometry or molecular monitoring), overall survival (OS), hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT), and transfusion independence (TI), were compared between the VEN cohort and matched CON cohort. A subset of VEN pts ≥75 years old or with ≥1 comorbidity of interest (based on the Ferrara criteria) and their matched CON pts were analyzed separately (unfit subgroup) and results among pts with TP53 and IDH1/2 mutation were also reported. Results: Results are described in Table 1. A total of 176 VEN pts and 176 CON pts were included, including 116 unfit VEN with their matched CON pts. Overall, VEN pts received VEN-azacitidine (AZA; 76.1%) or VEN-decitabine (DEC; 23.9%) and 65.3% of CON pts received high intensity regimens. In the unfit subgroup, VEN pts received VEN-AZA (77.6%) or VEN-DEC (22.4%) and 55.2% of CON pts received high intensity regimens. The proportion of pts who were ≥75 years old was 34.1% and 50.9% in the unfit subgroup. A total of 64.8% of all pts were classified as ELN adverse risk, which was 67.2% in the unfit subgroup. Among pts with genetic mutations tested, 22.2% of VEN pts and 13.5% of CON pts had TP53 mutations and 19.9% and 14.6% had IDH1/2 mutations, respectively, which was similar in the unfit subgroup of each cohort. Among pts with a response assessment, 65.7% of VEN pts and 53.5% of CON pts achieved CRc (p<0.05) and 39.6% of VEN pts and 43.4% of CON pts achieved CR (p=0.53). In the unfit subgroup with a response assessment, 66.1% of pts in the VEN cohort and 44.6% of pts in the CON cohort achieved CRc (p<0.01) and 37.5% of VEN pts and 36.0% of CON pts achieved CR (p=0.91). Among pts with TP53 mutations, response was not statistically different for the overall and unfit subgroup. Among pts with IDH1/2 mutations, CRc was significantly higher in overall VEN versus CON (87.9% vs. 54.2%; p<0.01) and in the unfit subgroup (85.7% vs. 52.9%; p<0.05). The duration of CRc was not statistically different between the VEN and CON cohorts, overall or in the unfit subgroup. For pts who achieved CRc and had MRD assessed, 74.0% of VEN pts and 66.7% of CON pts had negative MRD. Similar proportions were observed overall and for IDH1/2 in the unfit subgroup although statistical significance was not met. HCT rate was 6.8% and 14.2% in the VEN and CON cohorts (p<0.05) and 6.9% and 12.1% in the unfit subgroup, respectively (p=0.26). The median OS was 15.8 and 13.9 months in the VEN and CON cohorts, respectively (p=0.20) and 17.1 and 12.4 months in the unfit subgroup (p=0.30). The 6-month OS rate was 74.3% and 70.1% in the VEN and CON cohorts (p=0.30) and 75.6% and 66.2% in the unfit subgroup (p=0.10). Among the pts with ≥56 days of follow-up, 61.9% and 54.8% in the VEN and CON cohorts (p=0.29) and 67.0% and 51.1% in the unfit subgroup (p=0.05), respectively, achieved TI. Conclusions: Pts with ND AML receiving VEN-HMA had significantly higher rates of CRc than matched pts on non-VEN-based regimens in the overall population, those unfit for IC, and with IDH1/2 mutations. OS and durability of response were similar in VEN and CON pts, despite 65% of pts in the overall CON cohort receiving IC and 55% in the unfit subgroup. VEN pts who were considered as unfit had similar clinical outcomes to the overall VEN pts. Although VEN pts with TP53 mutation had non-significantly higher CRc rates compared with CON pts, median OS was poor in both groups highlighting the need for novel approaches in this high-risk molecular subset. Figure 1View largeDownload PPTFigure 1View largeDownload PPT Close modal
更多
查看译文
关键词
acute myeloid leukemia,hypomethylating agents vs,venetoclax,aml real world evidence
AI 理解论文
溯源树
样例
生成溯源树,研究论文发展脉络
Chat Paper
正在生成论文摘要