In vivo Experiment for the Efficacy of Hemostatic Agents in Porcine Liver Punch Biopsy Model

Yoonhyeong Byun, H.J. Sohn, J.M. Lee,Jae Seung Kang,Young Shik Choi, Youngjin Han, H. Kim,Woon Yong Kwon,Ji Yun Jang

HPB(2022)

引用 0|浏览1
暂无评分
摘要
Introduction: Since the postoperative bleeding are poor prognostic factor, various hemostatic agents have been introduced. In this study, powder-type polysaccharide (Arista™ AH), powder-type thrombin (Avitene®), and powder-type thrombin (Beriplast®), which are commonly used hemostatic agents, were included. This experiment was conducted to compare the hemostatic efficacy between these three agents in the porcine liver punch biopsy model. Method: 60 punch biopsy lesions were uniformly prepared in 3 porcine livers. After the initial bleeding grade was evaluated, Arista™ AH, Avitene®, and Beriplast® were applied to each of 15 lesions. Then, the bleeding grade was checked at 1-minute intervals until 10 minutes. Results: There was no significant difference in the initial bleeding grade for each group. In a comparison of the time to hemostasis between each agent, Beriplast® (median 5 minutes [interquartile range 3-6] showed superior results compared to the other two agents (8 minutes [6-10] in Arista™ AH, p=0.014; 6 minutes [6-8] in Avitene®, p=0.019). Arista AH™ and Avitene® did not show a statistically significant difference (p=0.240). The lesions that failed to achieve hemostasis within 10 minutes was investigated, one lesion (6.7%) in Arista™ AH, two (13.3%) in Avitene®, one (6.7%) in Beriplast®, and rebleeding was checked in four Arista™ AH (26.7%). Conclusions: The hemostatic performance of the glue-type thrombin was superior in this study. And powder-type agent rebleeds when the shape of the applied surface changes easily. It will be important to select an appropriate hemostatic agent according to the characteristics of the agent.
更多
查看译文
关键词
hemostatic agents,vivo experiment,liver,porcine
AI 理解论文
溯源树
样例
生成溯源树,研究论文发展脉络
Chat Paper
正在生成论文摘要