The Study of the Physical Properties and Energy Sources of Five Luminous Type Ibc Supernovae
Research in Astronomy and Astrophysics(2023)
摘要
Abstract In this paper, we study five luminous supernovae (LSNe) Ibc
(SN~2009ca, ASASSN-15mj, SN~2019omd, SN~2002ued, and SN~2021bmf) whose
peak absolute magnitudes $M_{\rm peak}$ are $\approx -19.5$ to $-21$ mag
by fitting their multi-band light curves (LCs) with different energy source models.
We find that SN~2009ca might be powered by the \Ni model since the required
\Ni mass (0.56 \Msun) is comparable to those of energetic SNe Ic, while the rest four SNe
cannot be accounted for the \Ni model since their derived \Ni masses are $\gtrsim 1$~$M_\odot$
or the ratios of the \Ni mass to the ejecta mass are larger than 0.2.
This indicates that some LSNe might be powered by \Ni decay, while
most of them need additional energy sources. We then use the magnetar plus \Ni model
and the fallback plus \Ni model to fit the LCs of the four
LSNe that cannot be explained by the \Ni model, finding that the two
models can account for the four SNe, and the derived parameters are comparable to
those of LSNe or superluminous SNe (SLSNe) in the literature, if they
were (mainly) powered by magnetars or fallback.
We suggest that the magnetar plus \Ni model is more reasonable than the fallback plus \Ni model,
since the validity of the fallback plus \Ni model depends on the value
of accretion efficiency ($\eta$) and favors a large $\eta$ value,
and the magnetar plus \Ni model yield smaller $\chi^2$/dof values.
It should be pointed out that, however, the fallback plus \Ni model is still a promising model
that can account for the four SNe in our sample as well as other LSNe.
更多查看译文
关键词
luminous type ibc supernovae,energy sources
AI 理解论文
溯源树
样例
生成溯源树,研究论文发展脉络
Chat Paper
正在生成论文摘要