Outcomes of diabetic patients with acute coronary syndromes treated with aspirin in primary prevention

European Heart Journal(2023)

引用 0|浏览0
暂无评分
摘要
Abstract Introduction The use of aspirin in primary prevention (PP) remains a matter of international debate. In type 2 diabetes mellitus (DM2) patients with high/very high cardiovascular (CV) risk, low dose aspirin may be considered for PP (class IIb, evidence level A) in european guidelines in the absence of hemorrhagic contraindication. Objectives Our aim was to analyze in-hospital and one year follow-up (FU) outcomes of acute coronary syndrome (ACS) DM2 patients without previous atherosclerotic CV disease (ASCVD) treated with vs without aspirin in primary prevention. Methods A retrospective analysis was carried out of DM2 patients without established ASCVD admitted with ACS included in the Portuguese Registry of ACS between 2010-2021. Patients were divided in two groups regarding the use of aspirin in primary prevention (with-AG and without-NAG). Composite primary outcome (re-infarction, heart failure, shock, death – in-hospital) and secondary outcomes (one-year all-cause mortality and mortality/rehospitalization) were compared in both groups. Independent predictors of primary outcome were assessed by multivariate logistic regression. Survival analysis and cox regression were used to compare and identify predictors of secondary outcomes. P value < 0.05 indicates statistical significance. Results A total of 4517 patients were analyzed, mean age 68±12 years, 64.8% male. AG showed higher rates of hypertension (89.9%, p<0.001), dyslipidemia (74.1%, p<0.001), history of heart failure (9.2%, p<0.001), valvular disease (3.9%, p=0.002) and chronic renal disease (12.3%, p<0.001). STEMI presentation was more frequent in NAG (48%, p<0.001). Multivessel disease (mainly three vessels disease) was more frequent in AG (32.7%, p<0.001), but anterior descendent (AD) as culprit artery was more common in NAG (40.3%, p=0.013). Both groups had no difference in major hemorrhage occurrence. Primary outcome was more frequent in AG (18.6%, p=0.034). One-year all-cause mortality and mortality/rehospitalization were higher in AG (9.90%, p=0.004 and 32.9%, p=0.017, survival analysis). Independent predictors of primary outcome were aspirin in primary prevention (OR 1.38, p=0.026), age (OR 1.59, p<0.001), valvular disease (OR 4.46, p<0.001), STEMI at presentation (OR 2.20, p<0.001), LVEF <40% (OR 4.40, p<0.001) and Killip-Kimball class > I (OR 12.9, p<0.001). Aspirin in primary prevention (HR 1.84, p=0.004), chronic lung disease (HR 5.68, p<0.001), and Killip-Kimball class > I (HR 3.27, p<0.001) were predictors of one-year all-cause mortality. Conclusion DM2 patients with ACS treated with aspirin in primary prevention had worst in-hospital and one-year FU outcomes. Although with higher rates of three vessels disease, PP with aspirin showed less AD disease and STEMI presentation, with similar major clinical hemorrhage.
更多
查看译文
关键词
acute coronary syndromes,aspirin,diabetic patients,primary prevention
AI 理解论文
溯源树
样例
生成溯源树,研究论文发展脉络
Chat Paper
正在生成论文摘要