Corrigendum to Clinical significance of immunocytochemical staining for peritoneal lavage cytology in pancreatic cancer

The authors regret to inform that In Abstract section, there is change in the value of Hazard Ratio and P Value. The correction is as below: Original text “A multivariate analysis showed that cytology–final (+) was an independent prognostic factor for the OS (hazard ratio = 1.43; P = .049), whereas cytology–rapid (+) was not.” Corrected text “A multivariate analysis showed that cytology–final (+) was an independent prognostic factor for the OS (hazard ratio = 1.46; P = .029), whereas cytology–rapid (+) was not.” The authors would like to apologise for any inconvenience caused. Clinical significance of immunocytochemical staining for peritoneal lavage cytology in pancreatic cancerSurgeryVol. 172Issue 6PreviewPeritoneal lavage cytology for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma is conducted with both an intraoperative rapid diagnosis by Papanicolaou staining (cytology–rapid) and a final diagnosis by immunocytochemical staining at a later date (cytology–final) in our hospital. However, the clinical significance of cytology–final has not yet been elucidated. Full-Text PDF