How much can we improve two-section watch bills? Sleepiness, Fatigue, and Psychomoter Vigilance Performance during naval operations in the 6/6 and 7-5-5-7 watch bills

Stefan Röttger, Melanie Giesche,Johanna Abendroth,Thomas Jacobsen, Panagiotis Matsangas,Nita Lewis Shattuck

Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting(2023)

引用 0|浏览0
暂无评分
摘要
A traditional two-section watch bill (6 hours on / 6 hours off, starting at midnight – “6/6”) and a two-section watch bill better adapted to the human circadian rhythm (watches of 7, 5, 5, and 7 hours duration, starting at 3 a.m. – “7-5-5-7”) were trialed on two vessels of the German Navy with 67 study participants in a crossover design. Questionnaires were used to assess subjective sleepiness (ESS, KSS) and subjective fatigue (FSS). The psychomotor vigilance task (PVT) was self-administered with wearable devices before and after each watch. Over the course of seven days at sea, PVT performance worsened significantly with the 6/6, but not with the 7-5-5-7 watch bill. In the 6/6 watch bill, number of participants with excessive sleepiness and high levels of fatigue was higher than in the 7-5-5-7 watch bill although not at a statistically significant level. Marked differences between watch bills in crew performance started to emerge after 6 days.
更多
查看译文
关键词
psychomoter vigilance performance,watch bills,sleepiness,fatigue,two-section
AI 理解论文
溯源树
样例
生成溯源树,研究论文发展脉络
Chat Paper
正在生成论文摘要