Ibrutinib as first-line therapy for mantle cell lymphoma: a multicenter, real-world UK study.

Ann Tivey,Rohan Shotton,Toby A Eyre,David Lewis,Louise Stanton, Rebecca Allchin,Harriet Walter,Fiona Miall, Rui Zhao,Anna Santarsieri,Rory McCulloch,Mark Bishton,Amy Beech, Victoria Willimott, Nicole Fowler, Claudia Bedford, Jack Goddard, Sam Protheroe,Angharad Everden,David Tucker, Josh Wright, Vasavi Dukka, Miriam Reeve, Shankara Paneesha, Mahesh Prahladan, Andrew Hodson, Iman Qureshi, Manasvi Koppana, Mary Owen, Kushani Ediriwickrema, Helen Marr, Jamie Wilson, Jonathan Lambert, David Wrench, Claire Burney, Chloe Knott, Georgina Talbot, Adam Gibb, Angela Lord, Barry Jackson, Simon Stern, Taylor Sutton, Amy Webb, Marketa Wilson, Nicky Thomas, Jane Norman, Elizabeth Davies, Lisa Lowry, Jamie Maddox, Neil Phillips, Nicola Crosbie, Marcin Flont, Emma Nga, Andres Virchis, Raisa Guerrero Camacho, Wunna Swe, Arvind Pillai, Clare Rees, James Bailey, Steve Jones, Susan Smith, Faye Sharpley, Catherine Hildyard, Sajir Mohamedbhai, Toby Nicholson, Simon Moule, Anshuman Chaturvedi, Kim Linton

Blood advances(2024)

引用 0|浏览5
暂无评分
摘要
ABSTRACT:During the COVID-19 pandemic, ibrutinib with or without rituximab was approved in England for initial treatment of mantle cell lymphoma (MCL) instead of immunochemotherapy. Because limited data are available in this setting, we conducted an observational cohort study evaluating safety and efficacy. Adults receiving ibrutinib with or without rituximab for untreated MCL were evaluated for treatment toxicity, response, and survival, including outcomes in high-risk MCL (TP53 mutation/deletion/p53 overexpression, blastoid/pleomorphic, or Ki67 ≥ 30%). A total of 149 patients from 43 participating centers were enrolled: 74.1% male, median age 75 years, 75.2% Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group status of 0 to 1, 36.2% high-risk, and 8.9% autologous transplant candidates. All patients received ≥1 cycle ibrutinib (median, 8 cycles), 39.0% with rituximab. Grade ≥3 toxicity occurred in 20.3%, and 33.8% required dose reductions/delays. At 15.6-month median follow-up, 41.6% discontinued ibrutinib, 8.1% due to toxicity. Of 104 response-assessed patients, overall (ORR) and complete response (CR) rates were 71.2% and 20.2%, respectively. ORR was 77.3% (low risk) vs 59.0% (high risk) (P = .05) and 78.7% (ibrutinib-rituximab) vs 64.9% (ibrutinib; P = .13). Median progression-free survival (PFS) was 26.0 months (all patients); 13.7 months (high risk) vs not reached (NR) (low risk; hazard ratio [HR], 2.19; P = .004). Median overall survival was NR (all); 14.8 months (high risk) vs NR (low risk; HR, 2.36; P = .005). Median post-ibrutinib survival was 1.4 months, longer in 41.9% patients receiving subsequent treatment (median, 8.6 vs 0.6 months; HR, 0.36; P = .002). Ibrutinib with or without rituximab was effective and well tolerated as first-line treatment of MCL, including older and transplant-ineligible patients. PFS and OS were significantly inferior in one-third of patients with high-risk disease and those unsuitable for post-ibrutinib treatment, highlighting the need for novel approaches in these groups.
更多
查看译文
AI 理解论文
溯源树
样例
生成溯源树,研究论文发展脉络
Chat Paper
正在生成论文摘要