Comparative Experimental Study of Fracture Conductivity of Carbonate Rocks under Different Stimulation Types

Carbonates have great potential for development, but the use of propped hydraulic fracturing or acid fracturing stimulation types alone has limited effectiveness. This study collected four sets of rock samples from three carbonate reservoirs: dolomite, limy dolomite, and limestone. The laboratory analysis focuses on propped hydraulic fracturing, acid fracturing, and acid fracturing plus proppants of these rock types. The aim is to assess acid erosion, proppant embedment depth, and the impact of varying proppant sizes and acid injection on fracture conductivity. The results showed that acid fracturing substantially enhanced the hydraulic conductivity of the three rocks. The embedded depth of the small-sized proppant was greater, but the fracture conductivity of the large-sized proppant was greater. Under the conditions of the actual pressure of formation of 55.2 MPa in the target reservoir, using 70/140 mesh proppant, 20% thickened acid, and an injection rate of 20 mL/min: for the dolomite-type rock, the propped hydraulic fracturing method had the highest fracture conductivity, which reached 151.17 D center dot cm. For the limy dolomite-type rock, the acid fracturing plus proppant experiment had the highest fracture conductivity, which was 157.26 D center dot cm. For limestone-type rocks, acid fracturing had the highest fracture conductivity of 210.39 D center dot cm. This study helps to elucidate the mechanism of different stimulation types and provides useful guidance for the more effective development of carbonate oil and gas reservoirs.