Effects of passivation behavior on micro-electrochemical machining (ECM) performance of stainless steels with different metallographic phases in NaNO 3 and NaClO 3 solutions

To investigate the passivation behavior of stainless steels with various metallographic phases and their impact on micro-electrochemical machining (micro-ECM) performance, the electrochemical behavior of representative dual-phase stainless steel (SUS329J1), martensite stainless steel (SUS440C), ferritic stainless steel (SUS430), and austenite stainless steel (SUS316L) in NaClO 3 and NaNO 3 solutions were examined using potentiodynamic measurements and electrochemical impedance spectroscopy (EIS). EIS results indicate the charge-transfer resistance of the ferritic and martensite phases in the NaClO 3 is higher than that in NaNO 3 , suggesting a stable passive film formation in the NaClO 3 solution. Conversely, for the austenite phase, the passive film formed in NaNO 3 is more stable than that formed in NaClO 3 . Experimental results from ECM reveal a different trend in material removal rates (MRRs) with the use of NaNO 3 electrolyte SUS440C > SUS430 > SUS316L, contrasting with their respective MRR trends observed using NaClO 3 . Additionally, dual-phase steel SUS329J1 demonstrates a higher MRR than both SUS430 and SUS316L stainless steel. This study investigates the relationships between MRRs and metallographic phases of stainless steels, providing practical insights for optimizing electrolyte composition when machining different stainless steels.