谷歌浏览器插件
订阅小程序
在清言上使用

791 Timing of Exam-Indicated Cerclage and Pregnancy Outcomes: to Emergently or Urgently Schedule?

American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology(2024)

引用 0|浏览6
暂无评分
摘要
Exam-indicated cerclage (EC) is an important treatment for cervical insufficiency with the goal of preventing preterm birth (PTB). How the interval from diagnosis of cervical dilation to EC affects pregnancy outcomes is not known. A retrospective cohort study was conducted at a single academic center from 2015-2023. Patients with a dilated cervix < 24 weeks gestation (GA) recommended for EC were included. Multiples and patients with incomplete delivery data were excluded. The time interval (hours) from ultrasound with dilated cervix to operating room anesthesia was calculated and analyzed categorically (< 12, 12-24, > 24). Age, parity, GA at EC, cervical length, dilation, and prior PTB were collected. The primary outcome was GA at delivery. Secondary outcomes included latency from EC to delivery, PTB, PPROM, and NICU admission. Categorical variables were analyzed by Fisher's exact test. Continuous variables were assessed by ANOVA or Kruskal-Wallis test. Time-to-event curves were created to display time-to-delivery by group. Linear regression was used to assess the association between interval to EC and the primary outcome after adjusting for potential confounders. 155 patients with EC were identified. The median GA at diagnosis was 21.0 weeks (IQR 19.7-21.9) and cervical dilation 1.0cm (IQR 0.5-1.0). The median GA at delivery was 37.1 weeks (IQR 30.0-39.1). As a continuous variable, there was no correlation between interval to EC and GA at delivery (ρ=-0.02, p=0.83). Comparing groups, baseline characteristics were not significantly different aside from parity (p=0.048) and pre-EC amniocentesis (p=0.001). Linear regression showed no significant difference in GA at delivery between those receiving EC < 12 (β [95% CI]: 0.36 [-1.87,2.59]) or 12-24 hours (β [95% CI]: 0.83 [-1.75,3.41]) from diagnosis, compared to those at > 24 hours. There was no difference in secondary outcomes. We observed no significant correlation between interval to EC placement and GA at delivery. These results suggest that EC can be scheduled urgently rather than emergently with similar outcomes.
更多
查看译文
AI 理解论文
溯源树
样例
生成溯源树,研究论文发展脉络
Chat Paper
正在生成论文摘要