132. Does the Minnesota Runaway Intervention Program for Sexually Victimized Adolescents Work As Theorized?

joint and independent adolescent and parental vaccine attitudes needed for evidence-based vaccine promotion efforts.Methods: Semi-structured in-depth interviews with adolescents, and separately, their parents (total N¼17 dyads; 34 participants) were conducted in April to May 2023.The interviews focused on i) why adolescents did or did not receive recommended doses of COVID-19 vaccines, ii) family dynamics around adolescent vaccine decision-making, and iii) opinions on adolescent self-consent for vaccinations.Interviews were transcribed and analyzed by two independent coders using deductive thematic analysis.Results: Among adolescent participants (n¼17; two Asian, one Alaskan Native, eight Black, six White), 58.8% were vaccinated against COVID-19.Most adolescents made joint vaccination decisions with their parents (73%), however, 13% wanted to be vaccinated against COVID-19, but their parents forbade it.Seventy-eight percent of adolescents were against self-consenting to vaccination, believing that parents should be involved in the decision.Both adolescents and their parents reported safety concerns and not believing that adolescents were at risk for COVID-19 as top reasons for not being vaccinated.Among unvaccinated adolescents, 50% cited fear of needles as the main reason for not wanting a COVID-19 vaccine.Conclusions: Our preliminary findings indicate that adolescents are involved in vaccine decision-making and should be included in vaccine promotion efforts.These results are informative to the development of interventions to improve adolescent vaccine uptake.Additional planned analyses will focus on concordance between parental and adolescent-reported factors associated with COVID-19 vaccine acceptance.