Diagnosis and treatment of patients suffering from myocardial ischemia/infarction in the absence of obstructive coronary artery disease in Italian haemodynamic laboratories: results of the SICI-GISE national survey promoted by the GISE Young Committee

Background. Myocardial ischemia (INOCA) and acute myocardial infarction with non-obstructive coronary artery disease (MINOCA) represent emerging entities in the landscape of interventional cardiology. These conditions have heterogeneous pathophysiological mechanisms and clinical presentations, complex diagnostics, and high prognostic significance. Methods. This survey was carried out jointly by the GISE Young Committee with the support of the SICI-GISE Society and the ICOT group with the aim of evaluating the implementation of diagnostic-therapeutic pathways in cases of suspected/confirmed INOCA and MINOCA diseases. A web-based questionnaire based on 22 questions was distributed to SICI-GISE and ICOT members. Results. The survey was distributed to 1550 physicians with 104 (7%) responses. The majority of participants included interventional cardiologists (70%), in two-thirds of cases working in centers with high volume of procedures (>1000 coronary angiographies/year), who estimated a <10% annual rate of INOCA and MINOCA cases in their case load. Approximately 25% of the participants stated that they do not have the option of performing any investigation for the evaluation of patients with suspected INOCA, and less than 50% make use of advanced invasive testing for the diagnosis of MINOCA, including physiology and intravascular imaging tests. It also turns out that about 50% of respondents reported the present and future absence of dedicated diagnostic-therapeutic pathways. Even with a high perception of the clinical relevance of these diseases, about 40% of the respondents rely on clinical experience or do not deal with their management, also reporting a low prevalence of dedicated follow-up care (20% of cases followed at dedicated outpatient clinics). Factors predominantly limiting the prevalence of appropriate diagnostic and treatment pathways included the cost of materials, lack of training and expertise of practitioners, and of solid data on the long-term clinical efficacy of treatments. Conclusions. Currently, the proper management of INOCA and MINOCA disease is widely advocated but poorly implemented in clinical practice. To reverse the trend and solve the remaining controversies, it is necessary to enhance awareness, produce robust scientific data, and implement dedicated pathways for patients.