Can paediatric surgical registrars safely perform supervised hypospadias surgery?

Introduction Hypospadias repair is regarded as a technically demanding, complex procedure, with variable outcomes. Therefore, it tends to be performed by consultants, with limited trainee involvement. We aimed to study the clinical outcomes of supervised registrars performing proximal and distal hypospadias repairs, compared to their consultant mentors. Methods We undertook a retrospective review of all primary hypospadias repairs performed between April 2013–April 2022 at our tertiary paediatric urology centre. Redo repairs and patients lost to follow-up were excluded. Pre-operative anatomy, theatre time, grade of primary surgeon (registrar (trainees and non-training middle grades) or consultant), operative technique, follow-up duration, complications, and reoperation rates were recorded. The procedures were assessed in two groups according to the primary operator: registrar or consultant. The Zwisch scale is used to describe level of consultant support. Registrars as primary operators received “passive help” or “supervision” (Zwisch levels 3/4). Consultants as primary operators provided registrars with “show-and-tell” or “active help” (Zwisch levels 1/2). Results 270 procedures performed on 228 patients met the inclusion criteria. 109 were performed by registrars and 161 by consultants. In both groups, median age was two years (p = 0.23). Median theatre time was similar (registrars 2.8 h vs. consultants 2.7 h, p = 0.88), as was median follow-up (registrars 25months, vs. consultants 21months, p = 0.99). Operations performed by registrars were 76% distal and 24% proximal; and by consultants were 62% distal and 38% proximal. The overall urethroplasty complication rate was similar, at 24% for registrars and 23% for consultants (p = 0.89). The summary table shows the distribution of different complications. Re-operation rate was 16% in both groups (p = 0.99). Complications were further assessed according to operation type (TIP vs. two-stage repair). Discussion Contrary to popular belief amongst hypospadiologists, we found complication rates were similar for registrar and consultant surgeons. We question that involvement of registrars increases complications. The literature demonstrates safety of trainee performance of limited steps of the procedure. However our institution permits registrars to perform up to the whole hypospadias repair under direct supervision, with no predefined limit to their involvement. Conclusion Paediatric surgical registrars can be safely supervised to have substantial involvement in proximal and distal hypospadias repair, without compromising the duration or outcomes of surgery. We hope that allowing more registrar involvement can lead to faster acquisition of surgical skills, whilst remaining under the safety of senior supervision. Increasing opportunities for those with an aptitude for hypospadias repair can equip them with skills and confidence for entering fellowship training.Summary tableComparison between complication rates between registrars and consultants. Percentages are as a proportion of each groups' total operating.Summary tableRegistrarsConsultantsp-valueTotal no. cases; n109161Total urethroplasty complications26 (23.9%)37 (23.0%)0.89Urethrocutaneous fistula10 (9.2%)12 (7.5%)0.79Dehiscence of repair10 (9.2%)14 (8.7%)0.90Urethral diverticulum1 (0.9%)00.41Meatal stenosis9 (8.3%)9 (5.6%)0.55Urethral stricture3 (2.8%)5 (3.1%)1.0Recurrent chordee >30deg1 (0.9%)3 (1.9%)0.65Required re-do repair17 (15.6%)25 (15.5%)0.99