Adaptive trade-offs between vertebrate defense and insect predation drive ant venom evolution

Axel Touchard, Samuel D Robinson,Hadrien Lalague, Steven Ascoet, Arnaud Billet,Alain Dejean, Nathan J Tene,Frederic Petitclerc, Valerie Troispoux,Michel Treilhou,Elsa Bonnafe,Irina Vetter,Joel Vizueta,Corrie S Moreau,Jerome Orivel, Niklas Tysklind

biorxiv(2024)

引用 0|浏览3
暂无评分
摘要
Stinging ants have diversified into various ecological niches, and several evolutionary drivers may have contributed to shape the composition of their venom. To comprehend the drivers underlying venom variation in ants, we selected 15 Neotropical species and recorded a range of traits, including ecology, morphology, and venom bioactivity. Principal component analysis of both morphological and venom bioactivity traits revealed that stinging ants display two functional strategies. Additionally, phylogenetic comparative analysis indicated that venom function (predatory, defensive, or both) and mandible morphology significantly correlate with venom bioactivity and amount, while pain-inducing activity trades off with insect paralysis. Further analysis of the venom biochemistry of the 15 species revealed switches between cytotoxic and neurotoxic venom compositions in some species. This study highlights the fact that ant venoms are not homogenous, and for some species, there are major shifts in venom composition associated with the diversification of venom ecological functions. ### Competing Interest Statement The authors have declared no competing interest.
更多
查看译文
AI 理解论文
溯源树
样例
生成溯源树,研究论文发展脉络
Chat Paper
正在生成论文摘要