When to lavage in the absence of a sonographically visible joint effusion in painful total knee arthroplasty: a retrospective longitudinal study

Objective To determine if knee arthroplasty without sonographically visible effusion needs to undergo lavage to rule out infection. Methods Patients were accrued by a retrospective search of a longitudinally maintained radiology database looking for patients referred for ultrasound guided aspiration of suspected TKA infection. Clinical presentations, laboratory tests, intraoperative findings, and follow-up were reviewed. Results Four hundred sixty-nine patients were included (mean age of 67 years (range, 36–91)) including 251 females. Four hundred three patients had effusions, of which 57 were infected based on ultrasound-guided and surgical aspirates. Sixty-four patients lacked effusions, of which 47 underwent lavage at the clinicians’ request, with 6/47 infected. Nineteen patients without effusion were not lavaged at the clinicians’ request due to low suspicion, and none were infected. Patients with positive lavage cultures all had clinical risk factors. Infection rates were significantly higher in patients with joint effusion and clinical suspicion for infection compared to absent joint effusion and absent clinical suspicion. A significantly higher proportion of patients with hyperemia or moderate-severe synovial thickening on ultrasound were symptomatic and had joint effusion and positive joint cultures. Aspiration of native fluid had 85% sensitivity and 100% specificity while lavage had a sensitivity of 57% and specificity of 100%. Negative predictive value for native aspirates was 94% compared to 86% for lavage. Conclusion A TKA with low clinical suspicion of infection does not need to undergo lavage in the absence of a sonographically visible effusion.