AI Ethics: A Bibliometric Analysis, Critical Issues, and Key Gaps

Di Kevin Gao, Andrew Haverly,Sudip Mittal, Jiming Wu,Jingdao Chen

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF BUSINESS ANALYTICS(2024)

引用 0|浏览0
暂无评分
摘要
Artificial intelligence (AI) ethics has emerged as a burgeoning yet pivotal area of scholarly research. This study conducts a comprehensive bibliometric analysis of the AI ethics literature over the past two decades. The analysis reveals a discernible tripartite progression, characterized by an incubation phase, followed by a subsequent phase focused on imbuing AI with human-like attributes, culminating in a third phase emphasizing the development of human-centric AI systems. After that, they present seven key AI ethics issues, encompassing the Collingridge dilemma, the AI status debate, challenges associated with AI transparency and explainability, privacy protection complications, considerations of justice and fairness, concerns about algocracy and human enfeeblement, and the issue of superintelligence. Finally, they identify two notable research gaps in AI ethics regarding the large ethics model (LEM) and AI identification and extend an invitation for further scholarly research.
更多
查看译文
关键词
AI Ethics,AI Identification,Artificial Intelligence Ethics,Bibliometric Analysis,Human-Like Machine,Large Ethics Model (LEM),Literature Review,Machine-Like Human
AI 理解论文
溯源树
样例
生成溯源树,研究论文发展脉络
Chat Paper
正在生成论文摘要