Root surface treatment for delayed replantation of avulsed teeth in animal models: a systematic review

Stephanie Diaz Huaman,Marina Moscardini Vilela,Paulo Nelson-Filho, Andiara De-Rossi, Alexandra Mussolino Queiroz,Francisco Wanderley Garcia Paula-Silva

crossref(2024)

引用 0|浏览0
暂无评分
摘要
The aim of this study was to perform a systematic review of the in vivo effectiveness of different types of root surface treatment materials used in delayed replanted teeth following tooth avulsion in animal models. A systematic review was conducted according to the PRISMA statement. Two reviewers performed a database search for studies indexed in the PubMed, Scopus, and Bireme databases. Studies performed in vivo, in animal models with an avulsion/delayed replantation design (≥ 20 min of extra oral dry time) that evaluated the use of different materials for root surface treatment were included. The assessment for risk of bias was performed following recommendations included in Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions. We found 21 types of materials used for root surface treatment alone and 29 materials used with associations. Stannous fluoride, sodium fluoride, citric acid, doxycycline, Emdogain, alendronate, minocycline, Odanacatib, MFR buffer, recombinant human bone morphogenetic protein, gallium nitrate, acidulated phosphate fluoride, vitamin C, propolis, zoledronic acid, diode laser, indomethacin, fibrin sealant, adipose-tissue derived stem cells treatment and basic fibroblast growth gel. After Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation, four studies were scored as low quality of evidence, fifteen studies with moderate quality and six with high quality of evidence. Meta-analysis was not performed due to heterogeneity among studies and materials used for root surface treatment and therefore it was not possible to ascertain which material or protocol present better efficacy when used as root surface treatment material.
更多
查看译文
AI 理解论文
溯源树
样例
生成溯源树,研究论文发展脉络
Chat Paper
正在生成论文摘要