The safety and immunogenicity of a bivalent conjugate vaccine against Salmonella enterica Typhi and Paratyphi A in healthy Indian adults: a phase 1, randomised, active-controlled, double-blind trial

Prasad S Kulkarni, Anirudha Vyankatesh Potey, Sandesh Bharati, Anil Kunhihitlu, Bharath Narasimha, Sindhu Yallapa, Abhijeet Dharmadhikari, Vinay Gavade, Chandrashekhar D Kamat, Asha Mallya, Annamraju D Sarma, Sunil Goel, Sambhaji S Pisal, Cyrus S Poonawalla, Rajaram Venkatesan, Elizabeth Jones, Amy Flaxman, Young Chan Kim, Andrew J Pollard

The Lancet(2024)

引用 0|浏览0
暂无评分
摘要
Background Enteric fever caused by Salmonella enterica Typhi and Salmonella Paratyphi A is an important public health problem, especially in low-income and middle-income countries with limited access to safe water and sanitation. We present results from, to our knowledge, the first ever human study of a bivalent paratyphoid A-typhoid conjugate vaccine (Sii-PTCV). Methods In this double-blind phase 1 study, 60 healthy Indian adults were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive a single intramuscular dose of either Sii-PTCV or typhoid conjugate vaccine (Typbar-TCV). Safety was assessed by observing solicited adverse events for 1 week, unsolicited events for 1 month, and serious adverse events (SAEs) over 6 months. Immunogenicity at 1 month and 6 months was assessed by measuring anti-capsular polysaccharide antigen Vi (anti-Vi) IgG and IgA against Salmonella Typhi and anti-lipopolysaccharide (LPS) IgG against Salmonella Paratyphi A by ELISA, and functional antibodies using serum bactericidal assay (SBA) against Salmonella Paratyphi A. This study is registered with Clinical Trial Registry–India (CTRI/2022/06/043608) and is completed. Findings 60 participants were enrolled. Of these 60 participants, 57 (95%) participants were male and three (5%) participants were female. Solicited adverse events were observed in 27 (90%) of 30 participants who received Sii-PTCV and 26 (87%) of 30 participants who received Typbar-TCV. The most common local solicited event was pain in 27 (90%) participants who received Sii-PTCV and in 23 (77%) participants who received Typbar-TCV. The most common solicited systemic event was myalgia in five (17%) participants who received Sii-PTCV, whereas four (13%) participants who received Typbar-TCV had myalgia and four (13%) had headache. No vaccine-related unsolicited adverse events or SAEs were reported. The seroconversion rates on day 29 were 96·7% (95% CI 82·8–99·9) with Sii-PTCV and 100·0% (88·4–100·0) with Typbar-TCV for anti-Vi IgG; 93·3% (77·9–99·2) with Sii-PTCV and 100·0% (88·4–100·0) with Typbar-TCV for anti-Vi IgA; 100·0% (88·4–100·0) with Sii-PTCV and 3·3% (0·1–17·2) with Typbar-TCV for anti-LPS (paratyphoid); and 93·3% (77·9–99·2) with Sii-PTCV and 0% (0·0–11·6) with Typbar-TCV for SBA titres (paratyphoid). Paratyphoid anti-LPS immune responses were sustained at day 181. Interpretation Sii-PTCV was safe and immunogenic for both typhoid and paratyphoid antigens indicating its potential for providing comprehensive protection against enteric fever. Funding Serum Institute of India.
更多
查看译文
AI 理解论文
溯源树
样例
生成溯源树,研究论文发展脉络
Chat Paper
正在生成论文摘要