Australian Students', Educators', and Practitioners' Experiences of Modified Field Education Standards During the COVID-19 Pandemic

Christine Morley,Vanessa Ryan, Maree Higgins, Lisa Hodge,Linda Briskman, Matthew Harcus,Robyn Martin,Nicole Hill

AUSTRALIAN SOCIAL WORK(2024)

引用 0|浏览0
暂无评分
摘要
Long-standing concerns about the sustainability of social work field education requirements were exacerbated by the COVID-19 pandemic. The Australian Association of Social Workers (AASW) implemented revised Education and Accreditation Standards (ASWEAS) during the pandemic as existing standards had become unworkable. The revised ASWEAS (during 2020 and 2021) allowed greater flexibility regarding how placements could be delivered, enabling students, educators, and practitioners to trial modified placements normally considered non-compliant. This article reports the findings of a national qualitative and quantitative survey that used Appreciative Inquiry to examine key stakeholders' experiences of the modified field placements. The findings demonstrated strong support for the modifications. The findings are discussed in the context of international standards and hold implications for the future development of ASWEAS.IMPLICATIONSA trial of modified field placements under revised ASWEAS due to the COVID-19 pandemic represented a timely opportunity to conduct a nation-wide, empirical study to explore experiences of different field placement models.Emerging empirical evidence confirmed enduring field education problems, and highlighted experiences that could inform more flexible, sustainable field placements.
更多
查看译文
关键词
Field Education,Placement Modifications,ASWEAS Standards,Student Learning,Student Poverty,Placement Poverty,COVID-19,Social Work,Field Placements,Pivoting,Paid Placements,Hybrid Placements,Social Work Education
AI 理解论文
溯源树
样例
生成溯源树,研究论文发展脉络
Chat Paper
正在生成论文摘要