Definition and perception of autonomy in vascular surgery training

Introduction There is a lack of data evaluating operative autonomy within vascular surgery. This study aims to determine where discrepancies exist in the definition of autonomy between trainees and attending faculty. Methods An IRB approved, anonymous survey was emailed to vascular trainees and attending faculty at all ACGME-approved vascular surgery training programs in the United States. Data was compared using chi-square statistical analysis. Results One-hundred forty-nine responses from vascular surgery trainees (n=89) and faculty (n=60) were obtained. The most highly ranked pre-operative skill by trainees was Case Planning, at all PGY-levels. Although a majority of trainees believe this skill is expected of them, only 36.1% of attendings responded that they expect all trainee levels to perform this task. Draping/positioning was ranked as the 2nd most important intra-operative task for all PGY-levels by attendings, however only 32.8% of attendings expect trainees to perform this. Exposure of Critical Structures was ranked as the most important intra-operative task by both trainees and attendings at the Chief and Fellow level. However, responses by both trainees and attendings showed that this is expected <70% of the time. When asked about double-scrubbing independently of other tasks, most trainees assessed double-scrubbing as inherently important to autonomy at all levels of training and within all regions. Only 44.3% of attendings responded that they expect all trainees to double scrub. Additionally, most trainees in all regions responded that they spend <25% of cases double-scrubbed. Conclusion These responses show a discrepancy between the skills that both trainees and attendings deem important to autonomy versus what is being expected of trainees in reality.