Method of comparing and transforming images obtained using UAV

The subject matter of this article involves reviewing and developing methods for the comparison and transformation of images obtained using UAV via Computer Vision tools. The goal is to improve methods for image comparison and transformation. Various image-processing methods were employed to achieve the goal of this study,thereby contributing to the development of practical algorithms and approaches for image analysis and comparison. The tasks can be described as follows: 1) development of image comparison methods: design tools for the comparison of images from UAV that efficiently detect differences using algorithms such as cv2.absdiff and the PIL module; 2) Image transformation: implement transformation methods for images from UAV, including perspective transformation and thresholding, to enhance the quality and accuracy of image analysis. The methods used were algorithm development, image transformation methods, statistical analysis, experimental testing, and performance evaluation. The metrics used in this article are response time and accuracy. Algorithms for image comparison have also been refined, particularly those transformed through Global Threshold Value, Adaptive Mean Thresholding, and Adaptive Gaussian Thresholding. A novel change filtering method was introduced to enhance the precision of image comparison by filtering out insignificant alterations following image transformation. Comprehensive investigation of image comparison involving edge detection methods has been systematically presented. The results contain the development of practical algorithms and approaches for image analysis and comparison applicable in diverse areas such as military, security, and agriculture. Possibilities of applying our methods and algorithms in the context of drones were also considered, which is particularly relevant in tasks related to computer vision in unmanned aerial vehicles, where limited resources and the need for real-time processing of a large volume of data create unique challenges. Conclusions. The results contain OpenCV and PIL image comparison methods. OpenCV pixel-by-pixel comparison algorithm showed a better response time with the same accuracy. OpenCV method has 92,46% response time improvement compared with PIL and is 276ms. As for image thresholding with comparison, a method based on Global Threshold Value showed the shortest response time (266ms) and the lowest accuracy. The highest accuracy and response time (366ms) were obtained using the Adaptive Gaussian Thresholding method.