Rates of Recurrent Intestinal Metaplasia and Dysplasia After Successful Endoscopic Therapy of Barrett's Neoplasia by EMR vs ESD and Ablation: A Large North American Multicenter Cohort.

BACKGROUND:Endoscopic eradication therapy (EET) combining endoscopic resection (ER) with endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) or endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) followed by ablation is the standard of care for the treatment of dysplastic Barrett's esophagus (BE). We have previously shown comparable rates of complete remission of intestinal metaplasia (CRIM) with both approaches. However, data comparing recurrence after CRIM are lacking. We compared rates of recurrence after CRIM with both techniques in a multicenter cohort. METHODS:Patients undergoing EET achieving CRIM at 3 academic institutions were included. Demographic and clinical data were abstracted. Outcomes included rates and predictors of any BE and dysplastic BE recurrence in the two groups. Cox proportional hazards models and inverse probability treatment weighting (IPTW) analysis were utilized for analysis. RESULTS:621 patients (514 EMR, 107 ESD) achieving CRIM were included in the recurrence analysis. The incidence of any BE (15.7, 5.7 per 100 patient years) and dysplastic BE recurrence (7.3, 5.3 per 100 patient-years) were comparable in the EMR and ESD groups, respectively. On multivariable analyses, the chances of BE recurrence were not influenced by ER technique (HR, 0.87; 95% CI, 0.51-1.49; p= 0.62), which was also confirmed by IPTW analysis (ESD vs EMR: HR, 0.98; 95% CI, 0.56-1.73; p= 0.94). BE length, lesion size, and history of cigarette smoking were independent predictors of BE recurrence. CONCLUSIONS:Patients with BE dysplasia/neoplasia achieving CRIM, initially treated with EMR/ablation had comparable recurrence rates to ESD/ablation. Randomized trials are needed to confirm these outcomes between the two ER techniques.