谷歌浏览器插件
订阅小程序
在清言上使用

In Reply to "addressing Methodological and Interpretive Concerns in a Systematic Review on Dialysis Experiences of Indigenous Patients in British Colonized Countries".

American journal of kidney diseases(2024)

引用 0|浏览10
暂无评分
摘要
We thank Wei et al (1) for their commentary on our article. Firstly, the assessment of the quality of the conduct of qualitative studies is contentious and there is no universally accepted framework for assessing the quality of the conduct of studies (2). Also, there is no empiric basis to ascertain if specific processes, such as the use of software to support coding and analysis, results in better "quality" data. Thus, we assessed the comprehensiveness of the reporting of the included qualitative studies using COREQ (3), a tool widely accepted and used in previous systematic reviews and synthesis of qualitative studies across a wide range of fields (4, 5).
更多
查看译文
AI 理解论文
溯源树
样例
生成溯源树,研究论文发展脉络
Chat Paper
正在生成论文摘要