Reporting time toxicity in prospective cancer clinical trials: A scoping review

Patrick L. Quinn, Shah Saiyed, Connor Hannon,Angela Sarna,Brittany L. Waterman,Jordan M. Cloyd, Rodney Spriggs,Laura J. Rush,Ann Scheck McAlearney,Aslam Ejaz

Supportive Care in Cancer(2024)

引用 0|浏览4
暂无评分
摘要
This review aimed to assess the measurement and reporting of time toxicity (i.e., time spent receiving care) within prospective oncologic studies. On July 23, 2023, PubMed, Scopus, and Embase were queried for prospective or randomized controlled trials (RCT) from 1984 to 2023 that reported time toxicity as a primary or secondary outcome for oncologic treatments or interventions. Secondary analyses of RCTs were included if they reported time toxicity. The included studies were then evaluated for how they reported and defined time toxicity. The initial query identified 883 records, with 10 studies (3 RCTs, 2 prospective cohort studies, and 5 secondary analyses of RCTs) meeting the final inclusion criteria. Treatment interventions included surgery (n = 5), systemic therapies (n = 4), and specialized palliative care (n = 1). The metric “days alive and out of the hospital” was used by 80
更多
查看译文
关键词
Scoping review,Time toxicity,Patient-centered,Cancer treatment
AI 理解论文
溯源树
样例
生成溯源树,研究论文发展脉络
Chat Paper
正在生成论文摘要