0776 Polysomnography in Neonates with Myelomeningocele: Variability in Scoring and Interpretation

Abstract Introduction A prospective, longitudinal, multicenter study was designed to test the hypothesis that sleep-disordered breathing (SDB) is ubiquitous among newborns with myelomeningocele (MMC). We evaluated variability in polysomnography (PSG) scoring and interpretation. Methods Nine US pediatric centers participated. Neonates with MMC born at >30 weeks gestation underwent bedside PSG at ≥35 weeks postmenstrual age, before hospital discharge. PSGs were scored by registered technologists (RPSGTs) at each site using AASM Scoring Manual infant criteria and interpreted by a board-certified sleep medicine physician (BCSMP). A single, central RPSGT blinded to clinical outcomes then re-scored all PSGs. One of two pediatric BCSMPs reviewed each study; the two BCSMPs jointly determined diagnoses for consensus central reports. Differences in scoring and overall PSG interpretation were evaluated with kappa and intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC). Results For 110 neonates with MMC, the median apnea-hypopnea index (AHI) was 26.5 [11.3-43.3] as reported by sites, and 23.0 [IQR 13.0-44.8] as reported centrally (к 0.81). The central apnea index (CAI) was also scored similarly by sites (3.3 [0.9-7.0]) and centrally (2.6 [0.6-7.3]; к 0.88), as were hypopneas (15.2 [7.5;26.9]) and 14.1 [6.4;27.9]; к 0.82). However, the obstructive apnea index (OAI) was reported to be much higher by sites (10.0 [1.9-29.1]) than centrally (1.5 [0.5 – 4.1]; к 0.29). Moreover, overall PSG interpretation differed between sites and central reviewers. Obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) was reported as a diagnosis by sites for 57.6% of neonates, vs. 10.9% by central review (ICC 0.06); central sleep apnea was reported by sites for 26.6% of neonates, vs. 14.5% by central review (ICC 0.50). When hypopneas were the most prevalent respiratory events, central review favored a less specific diagnosis of sleep-disordered breathing. Conclusion Considerable variability in scoring of obstructive apneas, and in polysomnography-based diagnoses, may exist for neonates. Sites may have designated hypopneas as obstructive, driving the diagnosis of OSA, while central review noted equivocal features of neonatal hypopneas, leading to a less specific diagnosis of sleep-disordered breathing. Further work to develop infant respiratory scoring rules, and diagnostic criteria, and to evaluate their clinical use may be warranted. Support (if any) This study is supported by NIH (R01 HL147261).