Critical importance of correctly defining and reporting secondary endpoints when assessing the ethics of research biopsies

Laura A. Levit,Elizabeth Garrett-Mayer, Jeffrey Peppercorn,Mark J. Ratain

CLINICAL TRIALS(2024)

引用 0|浏览1
暂无评分
摘要
This article reviews the implementation challenges to the American Society of Clinical Oncology's ethical framework for including research biopsies in oncology clinical trials. The primary challenges to implementation relate to the definitions of secondary endpoints, the scientific and regulatory framework, and the incentive structure that encourages inclusion of biopsies. Principles of research stewardship require that the clinical trials community correctly articulate the scientific goals of any research biopsies, especially those that are required for the patient to enroll on a trial and receive an investigational agent. Furthermore, it is important to sufficiently justify the characterization of secondary (as distinguished from exploratory) endpoints, protect the interest of research participants, and report accurate and complete information to ClinicalTrials.gov and the published literature.
更多
查看译文
关键词
Research biopsy,clinical trial,adverse effects,ethics,translational research,secondary endpoint,exploratory endpoint
AI 理解论文
溯源树
样例
生成溯源树,研究论文发展脉络
Chat Paper
正在生成论文摘要