Survival and neurological outcome after bystander versus lay responder defibrillation in out-ofhospital cardiac arrest: A sub-study of the BOX trial

RESUSCITATION(2024)

引用 0|浏览0
暂无评分
摘要
Background and aim: Bystander defibrillation is associated with increased survival with good neurological outcome after out -of -hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA). Dispatch of lay responders could increase defibrillation rates, however, survival with good neurological outcome in these remain unknown. The aim was to compare long-term survival with good neurological outcome in bystander versus lay responder defibrillated OHCAs. Methods: This is a sub -study of the BOX trial, which included OHCA patients from two Danish tertiary cardiac intensive care units from March 2017 to December 2021. The main outcome was defined as 3 -month survival with good neurological performance (Cerebral Performance Category of 1or 2, on a scale from 1 (good cerebral performance) to 5 (death or brain death)). For this study EMS witnessed OHCAs were excluded. Results: Of the 715 patients, a lay responder arrived before EMS in 125 cases (16%). In total, 81 patients were defibrillated by a lay responder (11%), 69 patients by a bystander (10%) and 565 patients by the EMS staff (79%). The 3 -month survival with good neurological outcome was 65% and 81% in the lay responder and bystander defibrillated groups, respectively (P = 0.03). Conclusion: In patients with OHCA, 3 -month survival with good neurological outcome was higher in bystander defibrillated patients compared with lay responder defibrillated patients.
更多
查看译文
关键词
OHCA,Resuscitation,Defibrillation,Lay responder,Bystander,Cardiac arrest
AI 理解论文
溯源树
样例
生成溯源树,研究论文发展脉络
Chat Paper
正在生成论文摘要