Efficacy of endotracheal intubation in helicopter cabin vs. ground: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Lydia Johnson Kolaparambil Varghese, Jan-Jakob Völlering,Edoardo De Robertis,Jochen Hinkelbein,Jan Schmitz,Tobias Warnecke

Scandinavian Journal of Trauma, Resuscitation and Emergency Medicine(2024)

引用 0|浏览0
暂无评分
摘要
Pre-hospital endotracheal intubation (ETI) is a sophisticated procedure with a comparatively high failure rate. Especially, ETI in confined spaces may result in higher difficulty, longer times, and a higher failure rate. This study analyses if Helicopter Emergency Medical Services (HEMS) intubation (time-to) success are influenced by noise, light, and restricted space in comparison to ground intubation. Available literature reporting these parameters was very limited, thus the reported differences between ETI in helicopter vs. ground by confronting parameters such as time to secure airway, first pass success rate and Cormack-Lehane Score were analysed. A systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted using PUBMED, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, and Ovid on October 15th, 2022. The database search provided 2322 studies and 6 studies met inclusion and quality criteria. The research was registered with the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (CRD42022361793). A total of six studies were selected and analysed as part of the systematic review and meta-analysis. The first pass success rate of ETI was more likely to fail in the helicopter setting as compared to the ground (82,4
更多
查看译文
关键词
Endotracheal intubation,Systematic review,Meta-analysis,Helicopter,Ground,First pass success rate,HEMS,Time of intubation
AI 理解论文
溯源树
样例
生成溯源树,研究论文发展脉络
Chat Paper
正在生成论文摘要