Gender differences in the diagnostic efficacy of coronary CTA: Overutilization of coronary CTA in pre- and perimenopausal females? An editorial comment

Objectives Public campaigns such as the “Go-red-for-women”-initiative have raised heart-disease awareness and may trigger overutilization of coronary computed tomography angiography (CTA). Objective was to investigate the diagnostic efficacy of coronary CTA stratified by age and gender. Methods 1882 consecutive patients (58.9 ± 11 years;42.5% females) with low-to-intermediate pre-test-probability of coronary artery disease (CAD) referred to coronary CTA according to ESC-2019 guidelines, were included. Diagnostic efficacy was defined by the 1)negative CTA-rate 2)obstructive CAD (>50%stenosis) 3)High-risk-plaque and 4)CAC-score. Results The negative CTA rate was higher in females compared to males with 360/801 vs 292/1081 (45% vs 27%;p < 0.001). Females had a higher likelihood (OR 2.2:95%CI:1.81–2.67) of a negative CTA than males, despite they were older (p < 0.001). Obstructive disease prevalence was 25.6% and acceptable in both sexes (males vs females: 28.4% vs 21.8%;p = 0.0012). Males had more high-risk-plaque (23.6% vs 11.5%;p < 0.001).When stratifying age groups, negative CTA rate was highest in females <47 years (82.8%), but lower in males with 68.1% (p < 0.001), while obstructive disease prevalence was not different (males:6.5% vs females:4.6%:p = 0.874). Above 50 years, negative CTA rate (39.1% vs 17.6%,p < 0.001;OR 3.02:95%CI:2.381–3.823), and obstructive disease rate were higher in females (24.8% vs 34.7%,p = 0.0003). SSPSTm(V.25,IBM) was used for statistical analysis. Conclusions Above 50 years of age, diagnostic efficacy of coronary CTA is high in both males and females. In females <47 years, the negative CTA rate was highest with 82.8% and obstructive disease prevalence was low (4.6%), still justifying testing but recommending the use of specific tools (PROMISE minimal risk score) or other clinical tests for pre-selection.